Details, Fiction and fishing expedition case law
Details, Fiction and fishing expedition case law
Blog Article
If the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced an opportunity to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In a few cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only completed if the employee can show that they'd a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to steer evidence plus the petitioner company responded for the allegations as a result they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to become looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 204 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
A lessen court might not rule against a binding precedent, although it feels that it can be unjust; it may well only express the hope that a higher court or maybe the legislature will reform the rule in question. In case the court thinks that developments or trends in legal reasoning render the precedent unhelpful, and needs to evade it and help the regulation evolve, it may well possibly hold that the precedent is inconsistent with subsequent authority, or that it should be distinguished by some material difference between the facts in the cases; some jurisdictions allow for a judge to recommend that an appeal be carried out.
Stacy, a tenant inside of a duplex owned by Martin, filed a civil lawsuit against her landlord, claiming he experienced not supplied her sufficient notice before raising her rent, citing a fresh state legislation that requires a minimum of 90 days’ notice. Martin argues that the new legislation applies only to landlords of large multi-tenant properties.
We make no warranties or guarantees about the precision, completeness, or adequacy with the information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to on the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can develop inaccuracies. You should read the full case before counting on it for legal research purposes.
149 . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based within the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement inside the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.
Civil Courts retain jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be created and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more
PLR is a revolutionizing platform democratizing and making legal research easy and accessible in Pakistan :
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it's unclear how it relates to any given situation, frequently rendering judgments based about the intent of lawmakers plus the circumstances of your case at hand. Such decisions become a guide for future similar cases.
Only the written opinions of the Supreme Court along with the Court of Appeals are routinely available. Decisions in the reduce (trial) courts will not be generally published or dispersed.
Will you be looking for Court Information? You can use our site to search for any case or search for your person. Information within the site is updated every 24 hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found within the search site is provided to be used as reference material and isn't the official court record.
Federalism also plays a major role in determining the authority of case law in the particular court. Indeed, Each individual circuit has its possess list of binding case regulation. As a result, a judgment rendered while in the Ninth Circuit will not be binding during the Second Circuit but will have persuasive authority.
If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability within the matter, but could not be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making check here such a ruling, the defendants took their request towards the appellate court.
17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI 46 I have listened to the figured out counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) with the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession of your subjected premises into the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to generally be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this component for interim custody of the subject premises In the event the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two weeks from the date of receipt of this order. Read more
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming for the main case, It is usually a effectively-founded proposition of law that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence while in the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty in the charge, however, that is subject on the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for your reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings on the evidence.